<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>puzzling dot org: 2008</title>
        <link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/</link>
        <description>Updates to puzzling dot org: 2008</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@puzzling.org</webMaster>
        <ttl>1440</ttl>
        <item><title>Microblogging</title><link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/July/3/microblogging</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/July/3/microblogging</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:10:29 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tau-iota-mu-c.livejournal.com/130832.html">Tim Connors</a>
and <a href="http://blog.andrew.net.au/2008/07/02#microblogging">Andrew
Pollock</a> are bothered by microblogging syndicated on <a
href="http://planet.linux.org.au/">Planet Linux Australia</a>. This promises to
be an absolute pile-on in the bikeshedding manner, that is, very few people are
competent to comment on blog entries about SQL database underpinnings or
encryption design, but microblogging is exactly the sort of thing everyone has
an opinion on and shortly we'll hear them all. I hope I'm early in the
crush...</p>

<p>Microblogging itself varies in appeal for me as much as any other kind of
blogging. I guess the highs aren't quite so high: I've never seen a Twitter I
wanted to bookmark. But they're 140 characters, plenty short enough to skim
even if they aren't changing the world. I am not a huge fan of microblogging
that is clearly written for either the writer themselves (unadorned <q>having
dinner</q> <q>working late</q> without any attempt to write about it in a such
a way as other people might want to read) or as an alternative to SMSing a
significant other your plans for the evening. But most of it is about the same
quality and style as the random jabs at the world people occasionally insert
into IRC (in fact Andrew Bennetts should have a twitter account, but never
will), so, fine.</p>

<p>However I too do not generally find people syndicating their microblogging
to their main blog very interesting. Firstly, if I want to read your twitter
feed, I'm already subscribed to it through Twitter, so having it pop up in your
main blog is just two copies of the same thing. If the other microblogging
sites take off enough I'll add people to my feed reader instead. The same is
usually true of del.icio.us aggregations, <a
href="http://pipka.org/blog/category/delicious/">Pia</a> and <a
href="http://bethesignal.org/blog/category/delicious/">Jeff</a> Waugh being
something of an exception because they provide commentary aimed at readers. I
certainly won't be syndicating <a href="http://del.icio.us/mary">my del.icio.us
feed</a> any time soon, it's entirely aimed at me and if you want to subscribe
that's your lookout.</p>

<p>For Planets, I suggest the solution is to add a sidebar or two for
microblogging and links provided by Planet authors. This enables feed discovery
and mild entertainment for people who like the microblogging, but means that
people aren't stumbling on 30 character thoughts or unadorned collections of
links when they expected substantive prose. In this model, people syndicating
that stuff to their main blog are required to figure out how to exclude it from
what the Planet aggregates.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Unsolicited bulk email: still quite evil</title><link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/26/google-spam</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/26/google-spam</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:20:17 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Google,</p>

<p>I am not sure how to quantify the exact amount of evil involved in
unsolicited bulk email (I guess I could argue that it's even commercial email,
because you are a company promoting a product, even if it is a coding
competition), but let me assure you, the amount of evil is exactly the same in
<a href="http://users.puzzling.org/users/mary/misc/google-codejam.txt">2008</a>
as it was <a
href="http://users.puzzling.org/users/mary/misc/google.txt">either</a> <a
href="http://users.puzzling.org/users/mary/misc/google2.txt">time</a> in 2005,
and for that matter, in <a
href="http://users.puzzling.org/users/mary/misc/google-original.txt">2003</a>.</p>

<p>So, knock it off already.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Dry July sponsorship</title><link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/19/dry-july</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/19/dry-july</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:04:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>As the very model of a modern moderate drinker, you can think of me as your
reasonably safe bet to back for <a href="http://dryjuly.org/">Dry July</a>, the
Prince of Wales Hospital fundraiser in which participants gather sponsorship
and do not consume alcohol for a month! (If people want wild and daring, you're
out of luck with me until <a href="http://www.movember.com/">Movember</a>,
sorry.)</p>

<p>As it happens, one of my sisters and I have both been patients of Prince of
Wales Hospital during our lives (in my case, my recent compression chamber
therapy for suspected decompression sickness was done there) and so this should
be a matter dear to your heart as a way of ensuring the continuation of the
Gardiner lines in the eons to come. And the Gardiner livers, under-abused
things that they might be.</p>

<p>Sponsor me through <a href="http://dryjuly.org/DJProfile.aspx?p=126">my Dry
July page</a>.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Small blessings</title><link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/13/small-blessings</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/13/small-blessings</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:48:55 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>My laptop is only moderately recovered from a recent 'spillage incident', in
that the arrow keys do not work very well and I need to replace the keyboard.
<em>But</em> this cloud does have a silver lining. While the down key was
completely broken, I was unable to adjust the brightness of my screen downwards
(Fn+Down). During that time, my terrible (or terribly annoying) X slow crashes
in which I progressively lose the mouse, the keyboard and sanity in various
orders (because the main effect is the Ctrl key behaving as if it's being held
down, this last time I managed to scatter the same document all over my
Desktop, since Ctrl and drag is copy in Nautilus).</p>

<p>And now the Down key is mostly working, I can adjust my screen brightness
downwards... at the cost of needing to restart X every couple of hours. So,
there you go. I might even be able to file a bug, depending on what ended up in
the logs.</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>iTunes U: maybe the side of the angels after all</title><link>http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/13/itunes-u</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/13/itunes-u</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:48:50 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I <a
href="http://puzzling.org/logs/thoughts/2008/June/12/academic-content">posted</a>
that, per <a
href="http://www.cyberlawcentre.org/unlocking-ip/blog/2008/06/itunes-u-enemy-of-open-content.html">Unlocking
IP</a>, that iTunes U was only accepting content on the understanding that the
university itself didn't have the right to re-licence. <a
href="http://lardcave.net/">Nicholas</a> did what I didn't though, and went to
the source to find that the <a
href="http://images.apple.com/support/itunes_u/docs/iTunes_U_Copyright_Overview.pdf">iTunes
U licensing overview</a> is quite a gentle friendly document instructing
universities to check that their copyright is in order before distributing it
and suggesting Creative Commons and GFDL as potentially appropriate licences
for academic work.  Nicholas also observes that universities are retaining
their copyright, eg <a
href="http://www.smu.edu/itunes/faq/policies.asp">SMU</a>.</p>

<p>So unless iTunes U USA and iTunes U AU are signicantly different beasts, it
looks like all this is an object lesson (for me) in not citing without sighting
(not trusting to a summary of anything without seeing the original documents).
But good news overall, and my apologies for stupidly perpetrating confusion.</p>
]]></description></item>
    </channel>
</rss>